Wednesday, January 07, 2009

STOP DAN SLOTT NOW!


Via a reader who likes the Huffington Post AND Schwapp!!! Online, apparently. It's all tongue-in-cheek, natch. The article at HuffPo is worth perusing.

Posted by Unknown at 11:28 PM
Labels: , , , ,

23 comments:

  1. AnonymousThu Jan 08, 05:20:00 AM EST

    Do you have a crush on Dan Slott or something? Because you really seem to waste a lot of your time writing inane posts about a person you apparently can't stand. Just send him flowers next time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. AnonymousThu Jan 08, 01:41:00 PM EST

    Dan Slott will learn one day that you can't just spurn true love and expect to see no consequences! He will see that Ken Huxford is the ONE! He will understand what he lost, and the fact he could have been truly happy with Huxford, but now he will always be on the outside looking in! Or maybe he doesn't even know this guy exists, either way, that woman hating jerk!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousThu Jan 08, 02:16:00 PM EST

    Dan Slott made the Huxinator look like a total bitch, & he's had a hard time letting go ever since. It's really, really fucking petty.

    ReplyDelete
  4. UnknownThu Jan 08, 03:30:00 PM EST

    Wow, do I have three trolls responding here or just one anonymous person trying to make it look like they're a group? ;)

    When was the last time I took a shot at Slott before this week?

    And wouldn't the person who kept pestering the other one to call them at home after 12am be the stalkerish one? ;)

    ReplyDelete
  5. AnonymousThu Jan 08, 07:14:00 PM EST

    Dan, Dan, and Dan,

    Get back to work.

    ReplyDelete
  6. AnonymousThu Jan 08, 07:56:00 PM EST

    Whoa! You know, for being slightly insane looking, the woman in the picture above has a pretty decent body. Oh, and first post ever, btw. Keep up the blog! - Christian

    ReplyDelete
  7. AnonymousThu Jan 08, 09:01:00 PM EST

    Sept. 26th (unless you're counting yesterday's.) I needed do nothing more than click the DAN SLOTT tag on your blog. Of course, that also took me to the other dozen or so blogs you've written in your continuing attempts to get into a pissing match with the guy. Instead of, I don't know, taking the fucking high road, you come off like a petulent child who's going to keep poking the kid next to him, praying he gets a reaction. It is REALLY. FUCKING. PATHETIC. And you could do a whole lot better. If all you have to blog about is your "man crush" on Dan Slott, might I suggest taking in a flick or two, or reading a good book, or something.

    Oh, and to your question - it's at least two "trolls."

    ReplyDelete
  8. UnknownThu Jan 08, 09:10:00 PM EST

    I know how easy it is to find out that information.

    It is just much more effective if I make you have to type that the last time was in September so it makes your assertion that I blog about Dan Slott and nothing else look as ignorant and asinine as it is.

    When a person defeats their own argument, there's little worry that you actually have to keep giving them more attention.

    ReplyDelete
  9. AnonymousThu Jan 08, 10:59:00 PM EST

    Cheap shot. Grow up.

    Frag

    ReplyDelete
  10. UnknownFri Jan 09, 01:38:00 AM EST

    A picture of someone caged who looks vaguely like Tigra is a cheap shot?

    And so many attempts at humor are on the immature side. If I don't risk being immature as a blogger, I might stagnate. I rather risk being immature. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  11. AnonymousFri Jan 09, 07:46:00 AM EST

    I didn't "defeat" anything. My original point was that, ever since Dan & Marc made you the laughing stock of Newsarama, you've acted like a petty little bitch about it. Even if you took 3 months off. Just because it's been since September that you'd last taken a shot doesn't change the fact that you have around a dozen or so blogs on here about Dan, & all of them are pretty fucking childish.

    You're acting like the crazy girl who keeps blogging about her ex & all the "evil" things he's doing, & no matter how smug you want to act in your replies here, nothing will change that.

    ReplyDelete
  12. AnonymousFri Jan 09, 09:43:00 AM EST

    You act as if Dan Slott has taken a high road in this. There's plenty of evidence that he has not. Read some of his board postings. Hell, how can any of the other Anonymous posters prove that they ARE NOT Dan Slott? They can't.

    ReplyDelete
  13. AnonymousFri Jan 09, 12:09:00 PM EST

    OK, so no one else finds it extremely creepy that these people are naked and very exposed in front of children?

    ReplyDelete
  14. AnonymousFri Jan 09, 12:11:00 PM EST

    "You act as if Dan Slott has taken a high road in this. There's plenty of evidence that he has not. Read some of his board postings. Hell, how can any of the other Anonymous posters prove that they ARE NOT Dan Slott? They can't."

    Well, I certainly haven't seen any proof of Dan Slott NOT taking the high road. Where's your proof that he's been just as silly as Mr. Huxford? I bet you can't find it because it doesn't exist.

    ReplyDelete
  15. AnonymousFri Jan 09, 02:02:00 PM EST

    "Anonymous said...
    "You act as if Dan Slott has taken a high road in this. There's plenty of evidence that he has not. Read some of his board postings. Hell, how can any of the other Anonymous posters prove that they ARE NOT Dan Slott? They can't."

    Well, I certainly haven't seen any proof of Dan Slott NOT taking the high road. Where's your proof that he's been just as silly as Mr. Huxford? I bet you can't find it because it doesn't exist."

    Well, gee, it was in the original Newsarama thread that sparked their whole mess when Slott jumped into a conversation between Huxford and Guggenheim. It's been all over his message board at JinxWorld, unless he's gone back and deleted it.

    ReplyDelete
  16. AnonymousFri Jan 09, 03:27:00 PM EST

    "Well, gee, it was in the original Newsarama thread that sparked their whole mess when Slott jumped into a conversation between Huxford and Guggenheim. It's been all over his message board at JinxWorld, unless he's gone back and deleted it."

    Ooookay. So that's what sparked the ill will that Mr. Huxford feels. And how long ago was that? Hmmm? What has Slott done since then? Since both guys are only human, I'd give them a couple of weeks afterwards free reign to air their differences, anything after that would be a little bit sad. So you obviously don't know of anything since that Slott has done, while at the Same time, Mr. Huxford has posted many blogs about his dislike of Dan Slott. Obviously Dan Slott HAS taken the high road here.

    ReplyDelete
  17. UnknownFri Jan 09, 04:46:00 PM EST

    Heh.

    You really want to suggest that my blogging about something that has been a popular subject with internet fandom is evidence of my acting like a jilted lover?

    You're stretching. You really are. What you demand from me in order to give me your blessing as a mature, well-balanced adult is that I never mention Dan Slott's name again. That's not as completely healthy as you make it out to be.

    And, as far as high road, Dan Slott had me banned from Jinx World because of our personal disagreements. I didn't know you could find such petty shit littered across the high road.

    In all honesty, though, I gave up having any real animosity over all that a long time ago. Awhile ago, a colleague told me that they met Dan and he seemed to be a genuinely great guy. I told him that I didn't doubt that and that his behavior during our disagreement is unlikely to be a true indicator of the man he is.

    So, truly, one of you Anonymous posters, I think your own obsession is being demonstrated in these responses.

    ReplyDelete
  18. AnonymousFri Jan 09, 05:05:00 PM EST

    HAHA! Wow, Huxford. It's pretty obvious you are still holding on to a lot of animosity, when did you get banned from Jinxworld? Was it recently? Or was it shortly after your tiff with Slott? If it was shortly after, then my point still stands. Dan Slott = High Road. Has Dan Slott tried to start anything since then? Out of fairness, I don't think any response to your attacks should be construed as trying to start anything. The thing is, I bet he would be happy to reconcile if you shot him an E-Mail, then all this could be over. But I bet you don't want to do that, which is silly. BTW, I'm not obsessed, just bored, Fridays are sooooooo slow at work.

    ReplyDelete
  19. UnknownFri Jan 09, 05:24:00 PM EST

    If you only knew the stuff that has gone on offline...

    All the excuses in the world for Slott's behavior and all the stretching to paint mine as evil, but you're definitely not obsessed. The suggestion that all the stalker wants is for me to e-mail him and make nice is lovely, too.

    You (and Dan, if not one and the same) should go back to work now.

    ReplyDelete
  20. AnonymousFri Jan 09, 05:56:00 PM EST

    Heh. No stretching to paint you as evil, you've got a bit of a persecution complex going there. Just playing Devil's Advocate for Slott on a site that seems to uniformly hate or at least dislike him. And I'm about to close out my day anyways, so this long, dull day will be over with for me. You'll hear no more from me on this subject, don't worry.

    ReplyDelete
  21. AnonymousFri Jan 09, 05:57:00 PM EST

    OK, I lied, one last thing, at least you're willing to discuss this with a faceless internet peon, so kudos to you, sir.

    ReplyDelete
  22. AnonymousSat Jan 10, 03:38:00 PM EST

    there're some seriously intense nerds on this thread yo

    ReplyDelete
  23. Alan CoilSat Jan 10, 04:20:00 PM EST

    Kevin, I think you are wrong about who wrote that Tigra story. I think it was written by Dan Slott's evil twin, who goes by the name

    Don Slutt

    which shows why he wrote the character that way.

    ReplyDelete

It is preferred that you sign some sort of name to your posts, rather than remain completely anonymous. Even if it is just an internet nickname/alias, it makes it easier to get to know the people that post here. I hope you all will give it some consideration. Thank you.

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)